Japanese – Soviet Border Clash
On July 11, 1938 fighting broke out between Soviet and Japanese forces near Khasan, where the borders of Manchuria, Korea and Siberia meet. The fighting, which would continue for about a month, was initiated by the Japanese Kwantung army which expected victory in part because they expected the Soviet army to be weakened by the recent political purges of its officer corp and in part because they were Japanese and the Russians were not.
In the event although the two sides were roughly equal in number the Soviets were superior in armor, artillery and aircraft and the Japanese could make no progress against them. In the end there was a cease fire (August 11th) and an agreement (August 14th) to refer the matter of the correct boundary to a joint Soviet-Japanese border commission.
This was a setback for the Japanese who were motivated in part by a resentment over the 500 aircraft and other military supplies that the Soviets had sent to China since July of 1937. The Japanese had hoped to exert some deterrent effect on Soviet military aid to China. In May, the Japanese had used diplomacy to persuade Germany to withdraw its military advisors from China.
You may have noticed that the pace of postings about military events between China and Japan has slowed over time. This is emblematic of the fact that at this time the pace of Japanese offensive operations had become glacial. This did not prevent the Japanese from picking a fight with the Soviets and the Japanese continued to maintain large forces facing the Russians and to maintain as well fantasies of an option to “strike north”. The 1938 clash was Japan’s first encounter with a better equipped enemy in the period covered by this blog and should have been a clue that superiority in number and quality of weapons and equipment counted for more than the Japanese, with their faith in the power of superior morale and fighting spirit, preferred to believe.
As an aside I want to mention That I am struck by how fluid the situation was between 1936 and 1939. The occasions on which countries behaved in conflict with their ultimate alignment after the United States entered the war were numerous and significant. There will be more examples of this phenomenon as events unfold.
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Recent
- Assassination Attempt on Hitler – Munich 1939
- United States Amends Neutrality Act – “Cash and Carry”
- Sinking of the British Battleship Royal Oak
- The Polish Campaign: Results and German Lessons Learned
- The Polish Army of 1939
- Warsaw Surrenders
- Massive German Bombing Raid on Warsaw
- Chinese Counteroffensive at Changsha
- Soviets Invade Poland
- The World War II Game
- Polish Counteroffensive Defeated
- Battle of Changsha
-
Links
-
Archives
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (3)
- September 2009 (10)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Any evidence or references on the leadership qualities and capabilities of the two forces in 1938 (Soviet and Japanese)?
The Japanese and the Soviets had three significant clashes during the period covered by this blog – this one, again in 1939 and the last in 1945. This 1938 battle was the smallest.
In 1939 the Soviets were commanded by Georgi Zhukov who would later distinguish himself as the leading Soviet general of the Nazi – Soviet conflict. In 1945 the Japanese were completely outmatched by the veteran troops and leadership of the Soviets.
However, in 1938 there was little in the way of imaginative tactics or leadership. Both sides fought bravely and with tactical competence but the scale of equipment proved to be the margin of victory – the scale of the victory being that the Soviets held their positions and thus compelled the Japanese to make minor concessions to obtain a cease fire.